<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>Xcontact &#187; Versus</title> <atom:link href="http://www.xcontact.ro/tag/versus/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.xcontact.ro</link> <description>stiri si tutoriale IT &#038; SEO - software free download</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 13:32:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>PC-BSD 1.4 (da Vinci) &#8211; Viva la Revolucion!</title><link>http://www.xcontact.ro/pc-bsd-113.html</link> <comments>http://www.xcontact.ro/pc-bsd-113.html#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:58:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category> <category><![CDATA[apple]]></category> <category><![CDATA[darwin]]></category> <category><![CDATA[instalare]]></category> <category><![CDATA[kernel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[linux]]></category> <category><![CDATA[pc bsd]]></category> <category><![CDATA[pcbsd]]></category> <category><![CDATA[unix]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Versus]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xcontact.ro/pc-bsd-113.html</guid> <description><![CDATA[Toti utilizatorii de Windows fie el XP sau Vista ajung cu timpul sa considere acest sistem de operare un pic depasit de dorinta lor de performanta si siguranta.Daca visezi la un sistem de operare care nu are virusi, la un sistem de operare GRATUIT, la un sistem de operare in care fiecare parametru sa functioneze [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.xcontact.ro/pc-bsd-113.html/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title><link>http://www.xcontact.ro/windows-vista-vs-windows-xp-66.html</link> <comments>http://www.xcontact.ro/windows-vista-vs-windows-xp-66.html#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 14:39:37 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Versus]]></category> <category><![CDATA[2gb]]></category> <category><![CDATA[64 bit]]></category> <category><![CDATA[additional memory]]></category> <category><![CDATA[aero]]></category> <category><![CDATA[antialiasing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[athlon xp]]></category> <category><![CDATA[ati radeon 9600]]></category> <category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[code memory]]></category> <category><![CDATA[comparison tests]]></category> <category><![CDATA[confusing sentence]]></category> <category><![CDATA[contemplating]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category> <category><![CDATA[decent performer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[desktop pcs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[directx 9]]></category> <category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category> <category><![CDATA[encouraging development]]></category> <category><![CDATA[express systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[far cry]]></category> <category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category> <category><![CDATA[frame rate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[frame rates]]></category> <category><![CDATA[frames per second]]></category> <category><![CDATA[game far cry]]></category> <category><![CDATA[geforce 6150]]></category> <category><![CDATA[geforce 7600gs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[geforce go 7600]]></category> <category><![CDATA[ghz athlon]]></category> <category><![CDATA[ghz pentium]]></category> <category><![CDATA[graphics board]]></category> <category><![CDATA[graphics drivers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[graphics hardware]]></category> <category><![CDATA[hardware vendors]]></category> <category><![CDATA[hp laptop]]></category> <category><![CDATA[initial results]]></category> <category><![CDATA[installed ram]]></category> <category><![CDATA[integrated graphics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[just for kicks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[memory configuration]]></category> <category><![CDATA[memory matters]]></category> <category><![CDATA[micro express]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[mixed results]]></category> <category><![CDATA[models]]></category> <category><![CDATA[multiple threads]]></category> <category><![CDATA[multitasking]]></category> <category><![CDATA[p4 system]]></category> <category><![CDATA[pentium 4 processors]]></category> <category><![CDATA[pixel shader]]></category> <category><![CDATA[polywell]]></category> <category><![CDATA[proe]]></category> <category><![CDATA[radeon x1600]]></category> <category><![CDATA[ram boost]]></category> <category><![CDATA[ready pcs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[test apps]]></category> <category><![CDATA[value pc]]></category> <category><![CDATA[video memory]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows media encoder]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows version]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.xcontact.ro/windows-vista-vs-windows-xp-66.html</guid> <description><![CDATA[Vista vs. XP Microsoft typically claims increased performance for each new Windows version&#8211;but nearly every one requires a somewhat faster system to perform as well as its predecessor did. First Vista tests, though, showed some mixed results, and one very encouraging development. Overall, test apps did seem to run slower with Vista. On less-expensive or [...]]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.xcontact.ro/windows-vista-vs-windows-xp-66.html/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.240 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-09 23:50:13 -->

